http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/ Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:02:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/#comment-125 Nick Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:17:37 +0000 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/#comment-125 I agree that Shields' deal is better (at least from the club's perspective). At the same time, I would trust Tulowitzki's abliity to have sustained success more than Shields—just because pitchers seem more prone to rapid demises. I agree that Shields’ deal is better (at least from the club’s perspective). At the same time, I would trust Tulowitzki’s abliity to have sustained success more than Shields—just because pitchers seem more prone to rapid demises.

]]> http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/#comment-124 Andrew Johnson Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:26:03 +0000 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/#comment-124 Tulo's a good player, but I didn't really get locking him up NOW after one season. This might seem weird, but I actually like the Shields deal better. Three years of team options ... that's flexibility. Tulo’s a good player, but I didn’t really get locking him up NOW after one season. This might seem weird, but I actually like the Shields deal better. Three years of team options … that’s flexibility.

]]> http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/#comment-123 Yigael Yadin Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:59:56 +0000 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/24/lock-em-up/#comment-123 Perhaps—dare I say it?—we need a Smart GMs tag. Perhaps—dare I say it?—we need a Smart GMs tag.

]]>