Comments on: Part II: 5 Pitching Prospects Worth Watching in ‘08 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/18/part-ii-5-pitching-prospects-worth-watching-in-08/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:16:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Nick http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/18/part-ii-5-pitching-prospects-worth-watching-in-08/#comment-785 Nick Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:59:36 +0000 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/18/part-ii-5-pitching-prospects-worth-watching-in-08/#comment-785 I have no clue who you are and know for a fact that I did not plagiarize anything. Care to provide a link to what you wrote rather than hiding behind a thinly-veiled attack? By the way, if you know it's not plagiarism, might it be a better approach to comment on the fact that we just have similar views? Believe it or not, people can come up with similar ideas without copying each other. I have no clue who you are and know for a fact that I did not plagiarize anything. Care to provide a link to what you wrote rather than hiding behind a thinly-veiled attack?

By the way, if you know it’s not plagiarism, might it be a better approach to comment on the fact that we just have similar views? Believe it or not, people can come up with similar ideas without copying each other.

]]> By: Franchise http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/18/part-ii-5-pitching-prospects-worth-watching-in-08/#comment-775 Franchise Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:04:43 +0000 http://defensive-indifference.com/2008/01/18/part-ii-5-pitching-prospects-worth-watching-in-08/#comment-775 The James Parr and Zach Braddock comments look...suspiciously similar to things I have written on public sites. Although not plagiarism, its a damn fine line. The James Parr and Zach Braddock comments look…suspiciously similar to things I have written on public sites. Although not plagiarism, its a damn fine line.

]]>